KMT's cancerous nature II

Professor 吳宗信 pointed out the extreme absurdity of the article. I will not repeat his fine points, but I have more to say. Alan Mulcany said

KMT is the cancerous growth that must be eradicated from Taiwanese public life (see Alan Mulcany: 陳雲南, 王清峰, 邱毅 should be charged for gross acts of interference)

This article is an immortal example of KMT's cancerous nature. First, this quotable:

吳育昇批評李遠哲，「荒腔走板 一無是處，完全沒有資格來做為一個諾貝爾獎的得主，完全愧對台灣、愧對國人、愧對這個國家。」

Generous amount of insults; no justifications. Why is 吳育昇 qualified to judge whether Lee deserved a Nobel Price? Is it possible for Lee to be 一無是處? If not, why say it? Why is 李遠哲 完全 愧對台灣、愧對國人、愧對這個國家. Why 完全? Why not Partially?

Isn't it a basic training that people talk sense, that they be responsible for everything they say? Then why is it that someone who is supposed to be an outstanding citizen, a legislator, could talk trash like this?

帥化民則說，「這種邏輯啊，除了顯示他個人的心胸狹窄、認事不清以外，我覺得他不足為世人所取。」

Insults and more insults; again no justifications. The world renowned scientist is deemed weak in logic and is narrowed-minded. Even though he is a Nobel laureate, he 不足為世人所取.

楊瓊瓔表示，「李遠哲前院長真的這麼說嗎？如果內容是如此的話，那這個是我們非常瞠目結舌。」

What made her 瞠目結舌? Why do we care that she 瞠目結舌? Is the report trying to say that since 楊瓊瓔 瞠目結舌, we are supposed to look down upon 李遠哲?

Taiwanese should ask themselves how they voted for such legislators and how they tolerate such so-called news report.

李遠哲痛責企業輕放扁　藍委批本末倒置

(2009/01/04 12:50)

痛責企業輕放陳水扁，藍：李遠哲本末倒置。

政治中心／綜合報導

前總統陳水扁深陷海外洗錢案泥沼，當初把阿扁順利送進總統府的前中研院院長李遠哲，卻反過頭來責怪送錢給阿扁的企業主們，甚至認為，國民黨拿得還更多！今天（4日）就有國民黨立委痛批李遠哲，本末倒置、邏輯錯誤。

前中研院長李遠哲(98.1.3)表示，「企業界拿了那麼多的錢給總統候選人，不只是民進黨，國民黨拿得更多，我們社會上錯的事情很多很多，所以你們不要針對陳總統。」

這段話讓國民黨立委覺得李遠哲的邏輯不可思議，根本是本末倒置。

國民黨立委吳育昇批評李遠哲，「荒腔走板 一無是處，完全沒有資格來做為一個諾貝爾獎的得主，完全愧對台灣、愧對國人、愧對這個國家。」

國民黨立委帥化民則說，「這種邏輯啊，除了顯示他個人的心胸狹窄、認事不清以外，我覺得他不足為世人所取。」

泛藍立委痛批李遠哲，愧對全國人民，甚至有國民黨立委一度不敢相信李遠哲會這樣說話。

國民黨立委楊瓊瓔表示，「李遠哲前院長真的這麼說嗎？如果內容是如此的話，那這個是我們非常瞠目結舌。」

自從前總統陳水扁一家涉入弊案曾經力挺陳水扁，甚至促成政黨輪替的李遠哲，也遭到池魚之殃，成為不少人批判的對象，只是，扁家收受企業界鉅額匯款，原因真的是出在企業主不該給阿扁那麼多錢嗎？